tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post916194943482317875..comments2023-09-04T01:31:11.524-07:00Comments on Adventures in nonsense: Please sign the letter to Trading StandardsSimonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14195003492084088327noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-51163873646997897412009-11-02T07:55:18.384-08:002009-11-02T07:55:18.384-08:00In addition, the system of measurement (asking par...In addition, the system of measurement (asking parents to record crying hours) adds another potential bias. The parents who were keeping the diaries were were not blinded.<br /><br />from reference 3. <br /><br />comment: Too many weresDr. Brian Bloodnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-22030622584689733562009-08-03T09:05:24.685-07:002009-08-03T09:05:24.685-07:00I've made those few corrections, thanks to all...I've made those few corrections, thanks to all those who commented.Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14195003492084088327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-14272402767509263472009-07-31T10:45:36.531-07:002009-07-31T10:45:36.531-07:00Point of grammar, your summary of study 8 states t...Point of grammar, your summary of study 8 states that one study is more irrelevant than another, I don't think that's possible. All irrelevant studies must by definition be equaly irrelevant in that they all possess a quantity of relevance which is exactly zero.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17238916320170093174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-50537935563838855762009-07-31T08:41:22.974-07:002009-07-31T08:41:22.974-07:00Thanks for the corrections, keep them coming if yo...Thanks for the corrections, keep them coming if you spot any more. I'll fix spelling errors in the doc, but I'll have to add in notes for any more serious changes because over 230 people have signed the doc as is.<br /><br />Won't get this done until Monday as I'm currently away camping for the weekend.Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14195003492084088327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-40115926559185981382009-07-31T07:57:43.255-07:002009-07-31T07:57:43.255-07:00Also, I think it is incorrect to say the Wiberg et...Also, I think it is incorrect to say the Wiberg et al study showed equal outcomes for dimethicone and chiro.<br /><br />The conclusion, as I recall, was that chiro performed better and that was without counting numerous dropouts from worsening symptoms in the dimethicone group.<br /><br />However, after Olafsdottir et al showed negative results, Wiberg and Nilsson appeared to concede, <a href="http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/84/2/138#124" rel="nofollow">here</a>, that non-blinding <i><b>might</b></i> be one reason for their own positive result.Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08026511553591079915noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-16366061302110759172009-07-31T06:14:44.056-07:002009-07-31T06:14:44.056-07:00"a trader is in breech" should read &quo..."a trader is in breech" should read "a trader is in breach".Nick Gibbinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15372799838410998693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5959094372836804855.post-65623069804622158772009-07-31T04:26:02.817-07:002009-07-31T04:26:02.817-07:003. Wilbery J, Nordsteen J, Nilsson N. The
I think...3. Wilbery J, Nordsteen J, Nilsson N. The<br /><br />I think you mean "Wiberg".Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08026511553591079915noreply@blogger.com